• Welcome to the PopMalt Forums! Whether you're new to forums or a veteran, welcome to our humble home on the web! We're a 20-year old forum community with thousands of discussions on entertainment, lifestyle, leisure, and more.

    Our rules are simple. Be nice and don't spam. Registration is free, so what are you waiting for? Join today!.

Why would anyone test that?

Wade8813

Registered Member
An early study by Plaut and Kohn-Speyer (1947)[13] found that horse smegma had a carcinogenic effect on mice.
Lol, wut?
 

Daemonic

Registered Member
Hate animal testing in the first place, and this......

This is just stupid, is there any information on what this was for?
 

MAgnum9987

Do What Thou Wilt
What were you looking up?
Lol
 

Shwa

Well-Known Member
V.I.P.
Hate animal testing in the first place, and this......

This is just stupid, is there any information on what this was for?
I think to see how many lol's from it's readers. Makes sense to me.

~Shwa
 

Daemonic

Registered Member
Oh, gotcha.

Guess I just didn't laugh since I'm against animal testing. ^^
 

PhoenixOverdrive

Registered Member
I found a full, government-funded study on how much visual stimuli is required from a hen to sexually excite roosters. They found that with the head, no beak or neck, etc, that it still worked.

It was published under "Effects of morphological variations of chicken models on sexual responses of cocks".

I'm not making this shit up. Even I couldn't be that weird. I've actually made it a point to figure out why instead of doing good things for the world government and private funding go to totally idiotic studies like this. They come up with the stupidest crap. I'm actually pissed off about this because this is the same money that adds up to the national debt and isn't going out to achieve real-life results.

In fact, if they took the money they were spending unsuccessfully trying to stop people from smoking pot, which has been proven to be a miraculous cure for everything up to and including cancer, autism and crime, and invested it wisely, world hunger would simply disappear into thin air.

How does one go about asking for money to take a hen apart and see what makes the rooster still want to fuck it anyway?!?
 
Last edited:

Daemonic

Registered Member
I found a full, government-funded study on how much visual stimuli is required from a hen to sexually excite roosters. They found that with the head, no beak or neck, etc, that it still worked.

It was published under "Effects of morphological variations of chicken models on sexual responses of cocks".

I'm not making this shit up. Even I couldn't be that weird. I've actually made it a point to figure out why instead of doing good things for the world government and private funding go to totally idiotic studies like this. They come up with the stupidest crap. I'm actually pissed off about this because this is the same money that adds up to the national debt and isn't going out to achieve real-life results.

In fact, if they took the money they were spending unsuccessfully trying to stop people from smoking pot, which has been proven to be a miraculous cure for everything up to and including cancer, autism and crime, and invested it wisely, world hunger would simply disappear into thin air.

How does one go about asking for money to take a hen apart and see what makes the rooster still want to fuck it anyway?!?
Shit like this makes me sick....

Then again I am a PETA.....

I got the impression most here don't like that group but that should give you and idea of how I feel about it...... This shit is fucked.
 

Wade8813

Registered Member
What were you looking up?
Lol
I think it was from a link in the Circumcision thread Hiei made. If not, it was directly related to that thread.

Shit like this makes me sick....

Then again I am a PETA.....

I got the impression most here don't like that group but that should give you and idea of how I feel about it...... This shit is fucked.
People for the Eating of Tasty Animals? :D

(Sorry, it's one of my all-time favorite bumper stickrs. I had to)
 
Top