washingtonpost.com - nation, world, technology and Washington area news and headlines So there you have it - true.. we've had proof, we've had indication, and certainly reason to investigate, as well as administration obstruction. But a lot of people have said - and is still saying, like Obama for example, that we should only judge their "intents". And not go on a "witch hunt", to prosecute /policies/ we disagree with. Which is the same as immunizing any administration from anything, except from admitting to "high crimes and misdemeanors" themselves. In public. Well, here's Bush saying right out that he's approved torture. Now what? Clearly some form of escalation against the President is warranted. ..What about prank calling the White House? Also, what do you think about Obama's standard for initiating impeachment proceedings?