Obama has stated that he feels the US Constitution is a living document and that as such, it must be interpreted according to the times we are living in. Tell me then, why do we have an amendment process? For example, he wants to twist the 2nd amendment to allow for an "Assault Weapons Ban". This has been accused over and over again of being unconstitutional. By reading the constitution "according to the times" then we are opening the door to our amendments being overturned simply by the stroke of a pen. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe it takes 3/4th's of the states voting in favor of adding or repealing an amendment before it becomes federal law. If something needs to be "reinterpreted" according to the times then it should be done so through the amendment process. If 3/4th's of the states don't approve so called "reinterpretation" then it shouldn't become law. Otherwise we can look forward to having our rights "reinterpreted" with the stroke of a pen vs due process.