Sleazy Lawyers

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by PretzelCorps, Dec 18, 2008.

  1. PretzelCorps

    PretzelCorps Registered Member

    We've all heard the story:

    Stupid Cop A touched Exhibited Evidence B without following Proper Protocol 53. Because the evidence has been "tampered with", Child Mass-Murderer C gets off scot-free.

    I know the analogy is a little off, but you know exactly what I mean --> Is it right that criminals can get away with --insert crime--, just because some crappy lawyer found out that --insert investigator-- "didn't follow protocol to a tee", essentially getting them off on a technicality?

    I think trials should be decided by nothing more than physical evidence; especially in this day and age of technology.

Share This Page