• Welcome to the PopMalt Forums! Whether you're new to forums or a veteran, welcome to our humble home on the web! We're a 20-year old forum community with thousands of discussions on entertainment, lifestyle, leisure, and more.

    Our rules are simple. Be nice and don't spam. Registration is free, so what are you waiting for? Join today!.

SCOTUS rules against EPA

Hilander

Free Spirit
Staff member
V.I.P.
The rules curbing emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants began to take effect in April. But the court said by a 5-4 vote Monday that the EPA failed to take their cost into account when the agency first decided to regulate the toxic emissions from coal- and oil-fired plants.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/06/29/supreme-court-rules-against-epa-on-power-plant-rules/

I realize it is expensive to institute these regulations but isn't our planet, our kids, worth it.

Even if the SC hadn't ruled against the EPA congress is preparing a bill to allow states to opt out of any regulation clamping down on heat trapping carbon dioxide.

Thoughts?
 
Top