hm, I don't know, I came up with this theory. The theory is that God can not be proved non-existent by science. A broad definition of science would be the study of things around us (people will probably argue this, but you get the point of what I'm talking about, if thats not your definition of science then I guess we're talking about two different things.) In the scriptures it talks about how God is above His creation, God is above what is around us, God is above science. God is not illogical but He is above logic, He is above what makes sense. So how can we disapprove God with things that are below Him? How can I use logic and sense to prove that He doesn't exist when He is above it? Trying to dissaprove God through science is like getting a deaf person to judge whether someone can sing or not. The only way to prove or dissaprove God's existence is by using things at God's level. What are things at God's level? Miracles done by Him, faith, etc. faith is not God, but it is a spiritual thing. Miracles are not God, but they are in the same area of God, the same category you might say. So I guess only spiritual things are included to figure out God's existance, not things around us. Not the physical world. So with this theory I see no point in scientists bringing up new discoveries to try and prove God non-existent, because it doesn't make sense to try to prove that Someone above logic doesn't exist by using logic. So basically, the replies I'm looking for aren't ones saying that God doesn't exist, and trying to prove it, but rather focusing on this theory. I've thought of things wrong with it. So discuss your thoughts and the holes in the theory. With saying that, whether your Christian, Atheist, etc. you can reply to this. I figure that the most problems people will find in the theory are brought up by misunderstanding it, I don't know how well I explained it.