I want to make an observation here on how rediculous this HR 1022 is. It's another "assault weapons" ban the Liberals are trying to pass. Lets take two weapons here. Both of which I own. Ruger mini-14 .223 (left) Savage Arms .308 (right) These are both similar weapons used for basically the same purpose, to hunt. They operate somewhat differently, the top is semi-auto .223 caliber (meaning one pull of the trigger gets one shot off) The bottom is a bolt action rifle .308 caliber (After one shot you have to reload using the bolt action slide you can see in the photo). They both can hold 6 rounds respectivley. The ruger can hold more based on the clip you use. I want to get into how ridiculous this is, and how this makes no sense what so ever. Here is a photo of the two different calibers. The .308 on the left, and the .223 in the middle. For comparison there is a 9mm handgun round on the right. The .223 (middle) is used in the semi-auto which they are trying to ban. This caliber bullet can not penetrate steel, and in most cases can not penetrate body armor. Where as the .308 (left) used in a regular old bolt action hunting rifle could put a hole in steel and a bullet proof vest from 100 yards. There is not much that could stop a .308 round. There is plenty that could stop a .223 round and a 9mm (both used in semi-autos) So I ask why is it congress is trying to pass this bullsh!t resolution when we can clearly see the weapons they are banning aren't as deadly as an everyday .308 rifle.