United Press International - NewsTrack - Top News - Obama praised by Louis Farrakhan Sadly, No! Uh-oh! They’re onto us! Also, Tim Russert with Obama on MTP. Question: how seriously do you take the very common idea in the media that if you do not wish to kill terrorists indiscriminately, wherever they may or may not be, bomb countries at random and agitate for killing people in a show of force - as opposed to the other party who draws the line on nuclear weapons.. unless they're really needed - then you are soft on terrorism? And how difficult is it actually for Obama to be endorsed by the former leader of the Nation of Islam? Is it, for example, more damaging for Obama to be defensive on MTP than being endorsed by Farrakhan? After all - it's obvious that being endorsed by aggressive, homocidal and gay priests is not a problem for the republicans - so isn't it obvious that it's the person's attitude towards the onslaught that determines the damage the candidate takes? Or is that yet again part of narrative that most people don't care about, in favour of other issues (like Hillary's temper ). Thoughts..?