Nintendo 64 N64 vs orignal Playstation who had the better graphics?

[fuzzykitten3769]

Who is your pick for who had the best graphics. My pick is a hard one because playstation had the funny pixelization and N64 had the edged polygons, but didn't have the pixelization. So over all I'd have to pick N64.

 

[Mirage]

I'd also go N64. It was a lot crisper looking. PS was more textured, but it appeared choppy because of it.

 

[SamusAran86]

really, there were nice graphical games on both systems... and they both had games that looked like utter crap... (Superman 64 anyone?)

I would have to go with the N64 because alot of games just overall looked better.

 

[Major]

N64, definitely. I always hated the pixelated look of the Playstation.

 

[Doc]

The N64 was smoother, which lead to the smooth graphics of the Gamecube. The Playstation went for the more realisitic look, but you also saw a whole bunch of pixelated mess.

I'm going to go with Playstation, becuase of the more realistic look. The N64's had more of a chance, but never were used for the realistic looks.

 

[nman77]

N64 was definately better. As many people have said, it was a lot smoother. And the Expansion Pack made some games very impressive looking at the time.

 

[dk_rare]

If I liked warping polygons, I would have to go the PS. But I like my graphics clean, so N64 wins hands down

 

[Albey]

I go with n64 also, thats one of the reasons i never owned a play station I.

 

[RossDude]

The game that popped into my head when I first read this was Turok 2. I remember thinking that game was incredible looking, even without the expansion pak. Then when I got an expansion pak I just drooled some more.
I'll go with the N64 on this one.

 

[Major]

Did the expansion pack really make that big of a difference? Games still looked the same to me.