I think this could be a good debate. Should the Most Valuable Player award be awarded to the best player in the league or to the most valuable player on a team that wouldn't have the same success if he wasn't part of that team? E.G Lets say a player in the NBA gets 31ppg 6apg 6rpg but his team only wins 30 games during the NBA season. Another player get 23ppg 6apg 7rpg but his team finished with the best record in the NBA. They wouldnt have the same record if he wasn't playing for them. Who deserves it? You can use that example when you make your argument.