Why do you consider one ancient scripture on the subject of God more credible than those that have come before or after? Why do you believe for example that Christ is the son of God and not Horus or Dionysus or any of the others that have made the same claims as Christ and have been regarded in their day in virtually the same way. Many believe that the Apocrypha itself is ripped off from pagan stories going way back. The pagan stories are almost identical to the stories of the Bible, so why do you give the Bible more credibility? You say you believe because "it is written", but there are earlier writings that you choose to not accept as divine. By what criteria to you discern that one messiah is the true messiah, and the others, written of long before, are not?Hi cham...Can you please rephrase your question so I can understand it better?