Ok, here's a mind twister for you. To start, allow me to say for the record that I do not support and will not support rape no matter the circumstances. Yeah, it's going to be one of those threads... Get out now if you can't think on a hypothetical level. I just saw "Children of Men" the other day and got to thinking of a spin off scenario. It's the year 2050 and a worldwide virus epidemic has killed all but a handful of humans who were immune. The human species has never been at any serious risk of extinction, but it would now face that very real possibility. The problem. The surviving females are either lesbian or simply don't want to reproduce with the surviving men. Could be the opposite too, to be fair. It's safe to say that technology and medical labs have gone to ruins as the world has pretty much fallen apart. There is nobody who can perform in vitro, and really no specimens available anyway. So, how important is the survival of humanity? What should be done in this situation? Let the human species die off for good or do what is necessary, something highly frowned upon in pretty much every society today? Simply put, is rape justified if the survival of the human species is on the line?