I think it would be great if they did have real DNA of a Bigfoot. As of yet no one has been able to come up with any conclusive proof of this creatures existence. Grainy out of focus clips or pictures that could be anything aren't going to do it for me. If they want to convince the masses this DNA evidence is real they should submit it for independent study.Bigfoot has long been considered a combination of folklore, misidentification, and hoax, but on Tuesday a team of researchers screened what they claim is conclusive evidence that the creature, also known as Sasquatch, exists.
Have these scientists PROVED Big Foot is real? Team unveils results of FIVE YEARS of research.... and say they have his DNA | Mail Online
With all the sightings, some dating back to 1721 you would think if it did exist there would be more evidence than a grainy picture. Why hasn't one been captured or killed by now. The only thing that keeps me thinking Bigfoot might be real is stories like this that was found in this mans journal although not real evidence but shows people have been seeing something for a long time.
Earliest recorded account
I've heard some pretty strange things in my area, animal sounds coming from the forest that would make the hair stand up on the back of your neck, but never saw anything. If I did I would probably have a heart attack from fright considering how big they are suppose to be. Others from here claim they have seen them and even had them throw branches at them. I have yet to have anyone to offer me any hard evidence.
Here's an article where someone claims to have pictures of it. As usual I'm not sure what that is in those pictures.
Does this image show TWO Bigfoot creatures? Woodsman photographed 'moving beast' in Pennsylvania¿ but there is no sign of it now | Mail Online