It depends what kind of debate you're talking about here. I'm assuming you mean some sort of organized discussion, correct? I've never been on a team or in tournaments for debating, but I'm always up for a casual one, as I'm sure many members of the forum can tell you.
I am not a debater because I aint good at it, but if anyone wants to have a sports debate then I am up for any challengers. Me and Godfather are having a great Basketball debate right now. Sports is my life and I know almost everything from the last 10 years.
ex ren affirmative. plan: ban torture. advantages: terror, human rights.
1nc [me] PIC: ban torture except in case of 'ticking timebomb' scenario. net bens: geneva rights legitimacy, terror.
also demo promo off case.
also solvency for human rights.
also some topicality shell or sumthin.
2ac: THATS A TOPICAL CP! NO WAIZ! VOTE AFF!
cx of 2ac: uh, so, are you saying the basis of this round is the resolution instead of plan text?
:uh, so, can we run disads on other cases? and have it matter?
:what? *judge in back of room tries not to laugh*
:uh, cx is over.
2nc: 7 mins of demo promo impact scenarios along with war on drugs shell w/ patriot act link and heg good shell w/ gitmo link
1nc: all of cp, both net bens, solvency, T, and still 45 seconds left for impact calc
1ar: THEIR NEW DISADS DON'T LINK TO CASE! <only response on them>
2nr: we win every single argument in this round.
2ar: i have long legs vote for me
judge after round: i don't even know where to start. so let me start with.. 2nr's analysis on winning everything is true.
judge walks out of the room.
Oh noes, Stan! Someone pm'd you while you were sleeping. How would you know if someone pm'd you IF you WERE sleeping? Huh? Huh? That's what I thought.
So the point of this thread? I don't know. I'm just trying to get this active because I don't feel it's very active in responses. In this thread, we'll debate about whatever one wants to debate about. Fair enough? I think so.