CIA destroyed 92 interview tapes

Steerpike

Registered Member
#1
Here is a link to the complete article.

BBC NEWS | World | Americas | CIA destroyed 92 interview tapes

The Central intelligence Agency (CIA) has destroyed 92 tapes of interviews conducted with terror suspects, a US government lawyer has admitted.

The agency had previously said that it had destroyed only two tapes.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has launched a lawsuit against the CIA to seek details of the interrogations of terror suspects.

Techniques involved are understood to have included water-boarding, which the Obama administration says is torture.
The acknowledgment of the 92 destroyed tapes came in a letter sent to the judge presiding over the ACLU lawsuit.


"The CIA can now identify the number of videotapes that were destroyed," the letter by acting US Attorney Lev Dassin, obtained by the BBC, said. "Ninety-two videotapes were destroyed."

The letter, dated 2 March, said the CIA was gathering more details for the lawsuit, such as a list of the destroyed records, any secondary accounts describing what was on the destroyed tapes, and the identities of those who may have viewed or possessed the recordings before their destruction.

Government lawyers said some of the information may be classified. "The CIA intends to produce all of the information requested to the court and to produce as much information as possible on the public record to the plaintiffs," the letter said.
Discuss.
 

ysabel

/ˈɪzəˌbɛl/ pink 5
#2
Is the issue here that they destroyed 92 and not 2 tapes or that they destroyed the tapes (whatever number it is)?
 

Steerpike

Registered Member
#3
Is the issue here that they destroyed 92 and not 2 tapes or that they destroyed the tapes (whatever number it is)?
Further down in the article, you can find this:

In 2005 a judge ordered the preservation of all evidence regarding the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay.
In December 2007, the CIA revealed that two tapes from interviews had been destroyed five months after the ruling.