I was reading this article and its nothing new, dont get me wrong we've done the Gun Ban threads over and over and over. But what catches my eye on this particular one is that the focus isnt necessarily on what is being challenged rather than who is challenging it. are we so broken as a system that judgements are now passed by who asks rather than how important it is that the judgement be passed? At what point are we sacrificing ourselves for the sake of a political win? Or even worse... sacrficing ourselves just to halt the other side? "Better to have Otis than the NRA," said Samaha. Why does this matter? If the issue is important.... should it really matter who is proposing or funding the fight?