Call of Duty leading or following?

Discussion in 'Video Games' started by MasterChad, May 15, 2007.

?

Do you think call of duty is following?

  1. Yes, It seems like it

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. No, no where close

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. MasterChad

    MasterChad Registered Member

    Is seems to me Call of duty is following the game company that made Battlefield

    (now why do i say this??)

    Battlefield used to be a WWII game and moved to modern combat then to future
    Call of duty used to be a WWII game and is now moving to modern conflict?

    I think Call of duty isnt being original...
     

  2. Merc

    Merc Certified Shitlord V.I.P. Lifetime

    There's no real "following" going on. They're just making the same switch that many game series eventually do from one time period to another. WWII shooters are like fucking rabbits . . . they breed overnight and you're overrun with hundreds of new ones each day, it's so freaking frustrating.
     
  3. Kazmarov

    Kazmarov For a Free Scotland

    Dude, Call of Duty stole everything from Medal of Honor. Battlefield? Not even close.
     
  4. Swiftstrike

    Swiftstrike Registered Member

    EXACTLY.

    I was wondering why no one ever picked that up...Remember Medal of Honor allied assualt.

    I do.

    But MoH was also made by EA...
     
  5. Kazmarov

    Kazmarov For a Free Scotland

    Well, it was a rebranding in terms of game engine and changing the narrative somewhat (MoH never had multiple characters), however the general way the game operates is pretty much pillaged from MoH Frontline and Allied Assault.
     

Share This Page