• Welcome to the PopMalt Forums! Whether you're new to forums or a veteran, welcome to our humble home on the web! We're a 20-year old forum community with thousands of discussions on entertainment, lifestyle, leisure, and more.

    Our rules are simple. Be nice and don't spam. Registration is free, so what are you waiting for? Join today!.

Barry Bonds 90's only vs. Albert Pujols


Sultan of Swat
Staff member
This is about 90's-only Bonds only (not his 2000+ years), vs. Albert Pujols. So who's better?

Here are some numbers.

Bonds 1990-1999 vs Pujols 2001-2010, per 162 games

Bonds: 1434 G, .302/.434/.602, 179 OPS+. 41 HR, 122 RBI, 124 R, 34 doubles, 130 BB, 85 K, 39 SB, 11 CS

Pujols: 1500 G, .331/.425/.622, 171 OPS+, 42 HR, 128 RBI, 122 R, 44 doubles, 95 BB, 67 K, 8 SB, 4 CS


Registered Member
Bonds - he could run, and was a top-tier fielder. Their hitting stats are too similar for me to pick someone based on that.


Better Call Saul
Staff member
Pujols is the better defensive player but the stolen base stats for Bonds probably puts him over Albert by a little bit.

But, of course, Bonds is a steroid user so do with that as you want